Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Korean cosmetics exports hit US$5.6 billion in five months

    June 8, 2026

    Egypt GDP rises 5.2% as foreign reserves climb

    June 8, 2026

    FAO backs $3.9bn GEF-9 funding for food security

    June 8, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    GCC UpdateGCC Update
    • Automotive
    • Business
    • Entertainment
    • Health
    • Luxury
    • Lifestyle
    • News
    • More
      • Sports
      • Technology
      • Travel
    GCC UpdateGCC Update
    Home » California lawsuit targets Tesla for racism
    Automotive

    California lawsuit targets Tesla for racism

    December 16, 2022

    In the complaint he made five years ago, Vaughn claimed that there was widespread racial discrimination and harassment at Tesla’s factory in Fremont, California, where he worked. Tesla Inc. is trying to stop his attempt to add more than 100 other factory workers as plaintiffs in a 2017 lawsuit claiming the electric-car maker’s production floor is a “hotbed for racist behavior.”

    California lawsuit targets Tesla for racismTesla Inc is making all out efforts to deter Marcus Vaughn, an ex-employee, from seeking class-action status on behalf of other workers. According to the three-judge panel, Tesla’s arguments were tentatively rejected. Vaughn filed a complaint five years ago alleging widespread racial discrimination and harassment at Tesla’s factory in Fremont, California. Tesla responded to the lawsuit with a blog post entitled “Hotbed of Misinformation,” in which it stated that three employees had been terminated following an investigation into the allegations.

    Vaughn stated in a sworn declaration that co-workers used the N-word at least 100 times, and that both Black and White employees referred to the factory as the plantation or slaveship. A number of high-profile lawsuits have been filed against Tesla as a result of its treatment of black employees at the Fremont factory, including one filed by the state of California in February.

    In March, a former elevator operator who previously won a $137 million jury verdict over discrimination will face off against the company over monetary damages. He refused to accept the judge’s decision that he was only entitled to $15 million in damages. The same attorneys are representing Vaughn in this case as well. A request for comment on the tentative ruling was not responded to by the company.

    Related Posts

    Porsche reveals bespoke 911 GT3 RS in Macadamiametallic

    May 18, 2026

    Mercedes-Benz unveils electric C-Class in Seoul

    April 21, 2026

    2027 Mercedes-Benz S-Class adds DIGITAL LIGHT micro-LEDs

    January 30, 2026

    Ford issues US recall for Escape Focus Explorer and Lincoln MKC

    January 22, 2026
    Latest News

    Korean cosmetics exports hit US$5.6 billion in five months

    June 8, 2026

    Egypt GDP rises 5.2% as foreign reserves climb

    June 8, 2026

    FAO backs $3.9bn GEF-9 funding for food security

    June 8, 2026

    WHO reports 507 Ebola cases across Congo and Uganda

    June 8, 2026

    UN envoy cites regional push to end Middle East conflict

    June 6, 2026

    Global health bodies seek $518 million for Ebola response

    June 6, 2026

    Investor interest lifts UAE real estate in global index

    June 5, 2026

    Abu Dhabi advances climate adaptation tools

    June 5, 2026

    Dollar heads for weekly gain as yen nears 160 level

    June 5, 2026

    WHO says Congo Ebola response improves as challenges remain

    June 4, 2026
    © 2021 GCC Update | All Rights Reserved
    • Home
    • Contact Us

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.